Another Age: Final Project Reflection

The final project for this course was a long time coming. I conducted interviews, read numerous texts on both filmmaking and old age, and watched (what felt like) hundreds of Youtube videos. I wrestled with the decision of whether to use live interviews with elderly subjects or to do something different-somethings making use of both editing techniques of activism and a talking head. I chose the latter for reasons that will follow.

The two sketches that I did were takes on the former idea. The first was a heavily edited interview with a 94 year old man. It did not include me as the filmmaker. This was a deliberate comparative/research oriented experiment. I wanted to see what something like this did to the subject first hand. I wanted to see the impersonal nature. I wanted to compare it with my second sketch, which would intentionally be completely different.

My second sketch was an interview with a 79 year old woman. It was one long, unedited, take that included me and the interviewee talking about the subjects of aging, ageism, retirement, and my project at large. The format of this sketch came more from ideas of cinema verite and raw mores of third cinema.

It was an idea of combination regarding the two sketches that helped to form my final project: "Another Age".

This project it a combo. It is an Eisensteinian montage of black and white clips of elderly people butted up against a color talking head of myself. I wanted to use the clash of the two types of film to illustrate my point about taking the featured clips' taking of humanity away from the elderly. The clips show their subjects as black and white, ephemeral, byte size, antiqued objects. They all present a facade of caring and authenticity, when in actuality they are directly degrading the people they seek to build up. My talking head is the opposite: it is me/very personal, in is a long unedited/unscripted take, it is raw, it is colored.

I chose to focus on this idea of clipped black and white PSAs/commercials (etc.) vs. my long colored talking head for a big reason. I thought it summed up what I had seen throughout the whole project. There is no lack of people who want to care and respect and help the elderly in our Western society. The problem is that even the people who do want to help put their charges in a box of fragility and senility. My video makes the suggestion that the elderly be treated as simply what they are--people. Give them back their humanity.

Another Age: Final Project

Sketch Two: Alwyn

Conversations about senior housing/representation

I recently had my friend Caitlin come to stay with me. She is currently in the process of applying to programs in gerontology and was lamenting the lack there of. It seems that there is really only one decent holistic/transdisciplinary program on Senior Housing in the US-- at George Mason in DC. It's scary and also a big shame.

We discussed the aging populations of both the US and Europe, as well as the positions elderly people hold in our cultures' and society. With the baby boomers aging and retiring and people having less children in anglo-european countries, the majority of the populations are (or soon will be) sitting at a very high median age. Increasing age averages means a necessity for increased care and representation of the elderly. Having trained carers and capable authorities on aging and the elderly will be essential to the legal and ethical care of those elderly people who require special or additional care as well as those in vulnerable positions legally or otherwise.

There are eight gerontology PhD programs in the United States. USC is the only private university with such a program and full funding is hard to come by at nearly all. Only two programs have any focus in applied public health. The field is remarkably small for what looks to be a huge demand. Who will be activists for the elderly? Can the elderly actively and radically represent themselves in a society that pushes them to the back seat?

The readings that we assigned for this class go into depth about how to shoot ethnography and how to represent the under (and well) represented. Many of them, from Mirzoeff to Nader, also cover ideas on the type of activist cinema we (or I) am attempting to shoot. While my readings on film theory certainly effect my cinematic practice, the latter mentioned texts make me question just what people and issues I want to shine my small spotlight on. Back to pragmatism and the why question.

My project seems to be moving in an educational direction--> educating the elderly on how they can empower themselves and educating the pre-retirement ages on best-practices. Of course, I am educating myself at the same time. Much of my footage and shooting has been in the form of conversation and interaction. I make no claims about being an expert on representations of the elderly, but I do have a camera, motivation, time, and a cause. By showing people what they can do and what goes on I am able to create and spread the ideas of activist cinema/documentary.

Regarding the first sketch: conversation with Graham

The edits in my first sketch were a hard decision to make. They were only necessary because the interviewee tended take a lot of tangents that were not related to the project. I had 30 minutes of footage, and a good deal of it was little stories.

I didn't include myself for the exact reason that Dr. Juhasz pointed out. The reason of power. I wanted my first video to be a more stock interview illuminating the power dynamic. It is certainly not how I plan to run my final project, but because power (and time) are such important aspects of this study on old-age I wanted some highlighting of both.

So many times we take what we want from conversation, especially with the elderly--this video is a critique of that idea. Because of the edits it is as if Graham exists as a anachronistic figure in the present sped up technological world. This is purposeful, not because I believe the preceding idea to be true, but rather because I believe the opposite to be true. Illumination via blunt edits and absence of the interviewer

Irish Ageism Commercial

This is an Irish commercial from 2008. I like the way its set up and executed--the message is delivered in a succinct yet simple way. I find the topic of ageism to one of the most interesting of this project. I've conducted three interviews now, and ageism has come up in some way, shape, or form in all of them. I like interviews to be fairly organic, so the topic has arisen on its own of via the desire of the interviewee.

Sketch One

Conversation with Graham

Death and Old Age

This entry is more personal then academic, but I certainly feel it is relevant to my researching of old age. Since this is more of a personal journal for myself and my professor I feel this is appropriate and necessary.

Two nights ago my Granny's best friend, whom I have known since I was a baby and my family for over 50 years, passed away. She fell in the night and broke her femur a week prior and was forced to go into hospital. She had surgery to reset the bone. At her age, 89 (to be 90 this year), it was a tremendously stressful operation and she did not end up pulling through. I understand that she lived a long and fruitful life and that she went with little pain. Dying is a part of life. From my research and interviews thus far I understand that often as one gets older death becomes more tangible and less terrifying. I suppose this is not true for some, but it is true for those over 80 I have spoken to thus far. This post isn't necessarily concerned with death, rather with the fallout when a loved one dies.

My granny's friend's husband, you see, has been left behind. He is older, 91 I believe, and suffers from dementia. I went with my granny to see him yesterday and he was, understandably overcome with grief. He sat in his chair, which he rarely leaves these days, and cried. He and his wife were lifelong partners. They had known one another since they were children and had been married for what I suppose bordered on 70 years.

I wasn't really able to speak as I listened to my granny speak with Albert (whose name I have changed). He was completely disoriented and tired and shattered. It really made me think about what it means, and can mean, to grow old. It also made me think about how our society treats old people. I won't say that Albert is treated unkindly, but I will say that many people I have seen interacting with him do not take him seriously because of his disabilities and age. I find this to be appalling. Ageism is a massive problem here in the UK, and I hope that by doing this documentary project I can shed some light on what it means to grow old here.

I wish the best for Albert. I will obviously not be interviewing him due to his handicaps, but I am glad I am able to write about this situation, and my thoughts surrounding it, herein.

Visually representing the venerable and vulnerable

For the past week I've been thinking about how to best visually represent the elderly people with whom I am working. I'm not familiar with them, as I came to England on a whim not knowing many people, but establishing rapport has not been difficult. I've found that the people I'm filming/interviewing are more then willing to both give information and be on camera. Getting release forms signed has not been a problem at all. In fact, my find the forms both "silly" and funny. Be that as it may.

My readings for this week (selections from the Visual Culture Reader and the essay "Up the Anthro" by Nader) reminded me that the burden of figuring out methodology and representation sits upon my shoulders. It sounds obvious I know, but I've found that I (and many colleagues and classmates) tend to shoot/film first and ask questions later. For this project, however, I am really trying to allow the theory to influence my project. I've done other projects (The Day Labor Cup) where we went in with a knowledge of theory but shot cinema verite style. Obviously the theory and our readings had influence on these past projects, but they were shot first and (actually) theorized later. We asked ourselves, post-filming, what were we trying to achieve/what did we achieve? For this project, represented here on The Descent, I want to make it clear that I am reversing this order.

I plan on including myself in my work with the elderly. I believe that this reflexivity is importance. I would, however, prefer for my theorizing to show in my footage rather than be told overtly-- other than here in this disclaimer.

In reality, I write this entry on this blog for myself. It serves as a reminder among other things. Last night I was speaking to my Grandmother and she said (referring to one of the people I am working with) , "X is a very vulnerable man." I mistook "vulnerable" for "venerable"- hence the name of this post. Both words apply to subject X but it is the former which concerns me here. These people, along with myself, are to be subjects in a film. They are also, however, people with whom I am building relationships- whether this is intended or not. Many are well over 70 and live solitary and often lonely lives. Our chats, I have been told now more then once, are the highlight of their week. I must represent them justly, but also- I think-honestly.

The Descent: new beginnings in old age.

This project is an exploration of old age. Here I will blog about my findings, share interviews with the elderly, and analyze concepts of ageism and venerability. I had originally intended to do a piece on a political group with which I was at odds, but than realized I was more interested in giving voice to the oft unconsidered and silent segment of all populations across the world. My interviews with the elderly will explore generational changes (in media, politics, and culture) and seek to ask and answer questions about age/ageism. I will post two video sketches based upon the project but influenced also by my readings on documentary film and theory. My final project will be a short documentary on giving voice to the elderly.

This poem was part of the inspiration for this project-

The Descent - William Carlos Williams

The descent beckons
as the ascent beckoned.
Memory is a kind
of accomplishment,
a sort of renewal
even
an initiation, since the spaces it opens are new places
inhabited by hordes
heretofore unrealized,
of new kinds—
since their movements
are toward new objectives
(even though formerly they were abandoned).

No defeat is made up entirely of defeat—since
the world it opens is always a place
formerly
unsuspected. A
world lost,
a world unsuspected,
beckons to new places
and no whiteness (lost) is so white as the memory
of whiteness .

With evening, love wakens
though its shadows
which are alive by reason
of the sun shining—
grow sleepy now and drop away
from desire .

Love without shadows stirs now
beginning to awaken
as night
advances.

The descent
made up of despairs
and without accomplishment
realizes a new awakening:
which is a reversal
of despair.
For what we cannot accomplish, what
is denied to love,
what we have lost in the anticipation—
a descent follows,
endless and indestructible .

William Carlos Williams